Nib #31 — Sentences: How Long is Too Long?

Short sentences are easy to read.


Long sentences — not just because they contain more words, but because all those words are patched together in unpredictable patterns of relative, dependent, and independent clauses — are much harder to read, and — as you may be noticing even now — their reader-unfriendliness tends to grow with their word counts. 


See?


There is no hard rule about how many words make a sentence too long. Psychologists tell us that at around 30-35 words, even smart readers start to forget how the sentence began. And we all know from personal experience that for the reader, the end of a sentence “never comes too soon.” As usual in writing, all things being equal, shorter is better. But sometimes things are not equal. After all, too many short sentences in a row make for choppy reading. So what is the Goldilocks principle was applied to sentences -- not too short and not too long?


The strike zone for most writers is an average of 15-20 words per sentence. 


The key word there is average. You’ll still need short sentences, which are great for quick clarifications, hard pivots, and revelatory mic drops. You’ll still need longer sentences to draw disparate ideas together in the reader’s mind. And of course, you’ll need both for flow — providing your readers the ear-pleasing sentence-length variety that echoes human speech.


Three more quick points on this topic:


  1. Don’t worry about sentence-length as you write. Whatever length of sentence you think in, that’s what your first draft should look like. Right-sizing sentences can wait for the editing and revision process.

  2. When cutting and breaking up sentences, start at the back. That’s where we tend to put cumbersome, superfluous phrases and clauses. If, once scrutinized, they prove important enough to keep, then they are important enough to anchor their own sentences.

  3. The best way to tell whether a sentence you’ve written is too long is to read it out loud. You’ll hear prolixity before you’ll see it.


And when in doubt, trust the old maxim: If you think the sentence may be too long, it is.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts