Nib #66 Ten Poems Speechwriters Should Memorize

James Michael Curley — the oft-elected, oft-imprisoned “Rascal King” of Boston’s Democratic political machine — used to give up-and-coming politicians a list of 10 poems he felt all public speakers ought to know.


Today these poems are, if anything, even more valuable to political speechwriters. For people who write for a living, memorizing poems is like a basketball player developing new moves or a musician learning a new instrument. They’re tools. The more poems you know by heart, the more tools you have to tackle any rhetorical challenge.


Reading poems is great. Reading them out loud is even better. But to have poetry, you really have to memorize it — so that their imagery, arguments, and insights become yours, too.


Even if you never have cause to recite these (or any) poems. Even if you never quote more than a line or two in all the speeches you’re ever called upon to write. Memorizing poems will enrich your approach and execution of the speeches you do write.


Curley curated his list over a lifetime of public speaking. It was like his golf bag, full of different clubs serving different purposes. Some were for eulogies, others for graduations or retirement parties, some for impromptu private remarks, others for political events. 


So, if you’ve ever thought it would be cool to have some poems on call but didn’t know where to start, try Jim Curley’s list:


1. Polonius’s speech to Laertes in Hamlet (“To thine own self be true…”)


2. “The Deserted Village” by Oliver Goldsmith


3. “It Can Be Done,” by Edgar Guest


4. “Abou Ben Adhem,” by Leigh Hunt


5. “Around the Corner,” by Charles Hanson Towne


6. “If,” by Rudyard Kipling


7. “Friendship,” an essay by Ralph Waldo Emerson


8. “A Psalm of Life,” by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow


9. “The Man in the Glass,” by Anonymous


10. “Rules of the Road,” by John Boyle O’Reilly”


Until next week… keep writing!

April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
February 7, 2025
Writing is a grind... but consistency compounds.
More Posts