Nib #30 — Never Utilize

Bad words come in many flavors.


There are obscenities and vulgarisms unsuitable for polite company. There are all those gross-but-vivid words we inherited from Middle English, like moist, phlegm and curd. And there are words that just rub some people the wrong way, like nuance in Diner:

And then there’s utilize


Utilize can’t claim to be the worst word in the English language — but not for lack of trying. The indictment against the word checks every box. It’s duplicative (of “use”) without any coloring distinction. It’s long and mechanical. It preens that fake -ize suffix like a peacock’s tail. And it’s French.


Utilize’s one redeeming contribution to society is as a BS meter. It’s a poseur word, used not to convey ideas but to sound smart. (This is why it’s popular among young writers trying to impress their readers, unaware it has the opposite effect.)

For all its faults, utilize at least gives us one of the few hard-and-fast, universal rules of English composition: never use the word utilize unless you’re writing about the word itself. Otherwise, use use.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts