Nib #52 — Congressional Speechwriting Pt. I: Congressman Who?

With the new Congress gaveling in today, a new class congressional speechwriters will soon be trying their hands at the old Mr. Speaker, comma, I rise in dot dot dot. So intermittently over the next few months, the Nib will try to help young staffers make congressional speeches great again.


Like most valuable writing advice, the best speechwriting tips are less about technical skills and more about habits of mind. Like this hard truth:


Congressmen aren’t all that.


One of the biggest mistakes congressional speechwriters make is assuming that their bosses are as central to their audiences’ lives as they are to their own. As if millions of people wake up in the morning desperately wondering what Rep. Smith thinks about H1-B visas or net neutrality.


Except for two or three senior party leaders, members of Congress are anonymous and seen as interchangeable, if not totally irrelevant. (If you doubt this, ask yourself how much you would care if a rando Midwestern congresswoman tomorrow announced she was for a flat tax or Medicare for All.)


Embracing this humbling — and deeply American — fact is the first step toward improving congressional oratory. Because it impels speechwriters to focus on their speeches rather than on the politicians reading them. 


That Congressman Jones supports a carbon tax or a border wall is not significant. Why he supports it, on the other hand, could be. It’s the why — the background, the evidentiary record, the analysis — that has the power to persuade.


At the end of the speech, you want the audience thinking, “Good point,” not “Congressman who?”


Hill speechwriters, then, should eschew both rhetorical platitudes (“America deserves better” or “wrong side of history”) and pretensions to authority (“Let us…” or “This isn’t who we are”). Instead, they should make good arguments — tight, cogent, and substantive — and let their speeches’ beauty come from their clarity and concision, not any bumptious affectations.


The one thing all congressional speeches have in common is that no matter who the speaker is, the audience is actually his or her boss. Good congressional speeches build from the humbling fact of public service up, rather than from assumed VIP status down.


Happy New Year. Happy new Congress.


And until next week… keep writing!

April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
February 7, 2025
Writing is a grind... but consistency compounds.
More Posts
Share by: