Nib #37 — Don’t “Let us…”

Here’s a Nib for all you speechwriters and speech-givers out there — which is all of us at some point in our lives. Are you ready? Here it is. 


Don’t start sentences with, “Let us…”


“Let us…” is one of the speechy-est of all speechy expressions. It’s the kind of thing that sounds like the kind of thing you hear in important speeches (which is to say, John F. Kennedy used it a lot). 


But hold on, you might say! Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln, John Paul II, and Winston Churchill all used “Let us…” from time to time. And if it’s good enough for the greatest orators of the age, why not for everyday congressman or school board member or town hall speakers? 


First, because chances are they are not among the great orators of the age — speechy rhetoric is hard to pull off. Second, and more importantly, because “Let us…” is an assertion of deep, earned leadership and trust. It’s a rhetorical technique of speaking for rather than appealing to one’s audience. 


When Dr. King said “Let us…” to civil rights activists, his own part in that “us” was acutely, heroically authentic. And President Lincoln’s 2nd Inaugural — “let us strive on to finish the work we are in to bind up the nation's wounds” — not only spoke for the ravaged Union he represented, but conspicuously included the conquered southern states in its “us.”


Of course, there are more ways to earn trust than leading millions of people through harrowing crusades. We all know beloved institutional leaders — clerics or business executives or headmasters or coaches — who have earned it over many years of devoted, sacrificial service.


Without that kind of trust, “Let us…” comes across as presumptuous and cringe. Imagine being a lifelong employee at Apple Computers, dating back to its Golden Age, how different “Let us…” might sound coming from Steve Jobs vs. Tim Cook. Just think about how you would receive “Let us…” from a politician you dislike in behalf of a cause you oppose.


In our increasingly divided and trust-deprived culture, would-be leaders should be submitting ideas to their audience rather presuming to speak for them. 


Let us all help stop orators from claiming trust they have not earned.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts