Nib #35 — Be a “Taker-Outer”

When it comes to editing, do yourself a favor: be a “taker-outer” and not a “putter-inner.” Here’s how.


Step one is pre-writing. Before you do anything else, make a plan of everything you want to say. Every argument, every statistic, every point, analogy, and anecdote.


Step two is including all of that content in your first draft — no matter how clunky or disorganized. Leave nothing out. This may make your first draft overlong. But that’s okay. 


So long as the draft includes everything you want to say, you put yourself ahead of the game. Because then your editing process will be less about “re-writing” (which is hard) and more about de-cluttering (which is easier).


A good, content-comprehensive first draft allows writers to approach the editing and revision process the way Michelangelo approached sculpting:


“The sculpture is already complete within the marble block, before I start my work. It is already there, I just have to chisel away the superfluous material.”


That’s what editing is at its best: chiseling away the superfluous material until all that’s left is the tight, compelling composition you meant to write all along. 


Take time in your pre-writing and drafting process to get everything you know you need in there. Then “all that’s left” is taking out what you don’t.


Until next week… keep writing!

April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts