Nib #1: How to Start Constituent Letters

Of all the questions young conservatives on Capitol Hill face, the easiest to answer may be, “How do I begin a constituent letter?”

One cannot deny the tyranny of the blank page and blinking cursor. But when answering constituent correspondence, conservatives come to the task with a philosophical life-hack at the ready. Conservatives should always begin constituent letters with the words, “Thank you.”
 
AEI’s Yuval Levin puts the point best (as usual): “To my mind, conservatism is gratitude. Conservatives tend to begin from gratitude for what is good and what works in our society and then strive to build on it[.]”

One of the things that really does work in our society is the bulletproof understanding -- on the left and the right, in DC and around the country -- that constituent letters must be answered. It’s one of the few concrete proofs left that Washington lawmakers work for the people and not the other way around.

Every communication congressional offices receive from everyday folks back home is a tiny investment in democracy, the Constitution, and the entire American experiment. So, all you conservative interns, staff assistants, and LCs out there: if you’re ever asked to draft a letter back to a constituent, there is only one way to begin: “Thank you…”

Until next week...

April 18, 2025
A good poem for Good Friday.
April 11, 2025
James Michael Curley's list of must-haves for public speakers (and speechwriters).
April 4, 2025
Two essays point to a generational opportunity for young writers.
March 28, 2025
Honest Abe was a great writer -- especially the one time he wasn't.
March 21, 2025
Not today, Satan.
March 14, 2025
The official Democratic response to President Donald Trump’s big speech before Congress last week offered the country not only a contrast of political visions, but of rhetorical strategies. Trump’s address was defined by — and indeed, succeeded on — the strength of its concrete details: specific programs cut, specific heroes lauded, specific private-sector investments announced (See Nib #61 ). Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin’s nationally televised speech immediately following Trump was, too. But not obviously. Most of the specific details of the speech were biographical, in the first 100 words. After that, Slotkin glazed over issues with airbrushed generalities: “We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on…” “… change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe…” “Today’s world is deeply interconnected…” “We are a nation of strivers.” The climax of Slotkin’s speech was almost a parody of homogenized political banalities. The two things we need to overcome today’s challenges, according to Slotkin and her speechwriters: “Engaged citizens and principled leaders.” Woof. On the other hand, Democrats know this poll-tested pap won’t move the needle. So what’s really going on here? The most likely answer is what boxers call the “rope-a-dope.” That is, Slotkin’s — and by extension her party’s — plan here is to put up perfunctory, superficial resistance to bait Trump into overreaching or punching himself out. This is what Muhammed Ali famously did to George Foreman in 1974.
March 7, 2025
Tuesday night's address was a speechwriting masterclass in the power of specific detail.
February 28, 2025
How to use, and not use, intensifiers.
February 21, 2025
Why an old-school writing exercise may be more valuable than ever.
February 14, 2025
Three reasons why Republican politicians should write short press releases.
More Posts